Задание №2 ЕГЭ Английский язык с ответом и решением
Ответ: 2122133
Условие
Вы услышите диалог. Определите, какие из приведенных утверждений А–G соответствуют содержанию текста (1 — True), какие не соответствуют (2 — False) и о чем в тексте не сказано, то есть на основании текста нельзя дать ни положительного, ни отрицательного ответа (3 — Not stated). Занесите номер выбранного Вами варианта ответа в таблицу. Вы услышите запись дважды.
Воспользуйтесь плеером, чтобы прослушать запись.
A) When leaving school Emily already knew that she would study medicine.
B) Emily left Melbourne to get new experiences.
C) Emily moved to Finland because she found her lab work in London boring.
D) In Finland people at university preferred to speak Finnish with Emily.
E) David is not happy about his experience of learning French in France.
F) David would like to go by the trans-Siberian train one day.
G) Emily is going to London again to continue her studies of immune system.
Запишите в ответ цифры, расположив их в порядке, соответствующем буквам:
| A | B | C | D | E | F | G |
|---|
Расшифровка записи
Emily: When I finished school I went to university, Melbourne University, and studied science. I then gained my university degree and after that I worked in a heart disease research institute. At that time I decided to start my career in medicine.
David: Did you work in Melbourne?
Emily: Yes, in Melbourne. So I worked for a year, a bit over a year on different patient recovery programs. Then I wanted to have a break so I went travelling and I travelled through Western Europe and ended up in London and I worked at the hospital in an immunology lab and that was more diagnostic work. It was quite interesting. And after that I moved to Finland.
David: It sounds great!
Emily: And I did my doctor’s dissertation there.
David: I’m sorry for interrupting, I am just curious ... was it in English?
Emily: Yes, every student who is doing their dissertation, they have to write their works in English. And the seminars are given in English as well.
David: So you were in Finland for about five years. Do you speak Finnish?
Emily: Not very well. I can understand a bit, but it is quite a difficult language and because English was my mother tongue they wanted to practice their English and preferred to speak English with me. But yeah I did take lessons and try to learn it... and that was all-
David: I understand. I’ve had a similar experience with learning French. My frequent business trips to France didn’t help me much in language learning — some basic skills only. I wish I could take time to start regular lessons.
Emily: Probably I needed more lessons in Finnish too. Anyway I decided to move back to Melbourne so I took the trans-Siberian train.
David: Incredible!
Emily: Once I got back to Melbourne I started my post-doctoral research which was in a different field from heart problems, actually in the field of our immune system.
David: Well, it is quite a different direction. What influenced you most?
Emily: I think it was my previous working experience in London and my colleagues at the lab who encouraged me greatly to start this. So that was three years and that was in Melbourne. Then I just published the work and decided to travel.
Подсказки — как подойти к решению
- Прочитай утверждения и отметь, какие содержат причину (из-за чего, потому что), а какие только факт. Запись звучит дважды: при первом прослушивании проследи биографию героини по порядку, чтобы не путать этапы её жизни.
- Разложи рассказ по шагам: университет, работа, поездка по Европе, лаборатория в Лондоне, Финляндия, диссертация, возвращение домой. Каждый пункт задания привяжи к конкретному этапу и выпиши опору, а спорные оставь на повтор.
- Ошибка — считать утверждение верным из-за похожих слов (medicine, Finland, French), хотя причина или оценка в записи другие. Проверяй, совпадает ли с записью именно причина, а не тема разговора.
Решение
Расшифровка записи
Emily: When I finished school I went to university, Melbourne University, and studied science. I then gained my university degree and after that I worked in a heart disease research institute. At that time I decided to start my career in medicine.
David: Did you work in Melbourne?
Emily: Yes, in Melbourne. So I worked for a year, a bit over a year on different patient recovery programs. Then I wanted to have a break so I went travelling and I travelled through Western Europe and ended up in London and I worked at the hospital in an immunology lab and that was more diagnostic work. It was quite interesting. And after that I moved to Finland.
David: It sounds great!
Emily: And I did my doctor’s dissertation there.
David: I’m sorry for interrupting, I am just curious ... was it in English?
Emily: Yes, every student who is doing their dissertation, they have to write their works in English. And the seminars are given in English as well.
David: So you were in Finland for about five years. Do you speak Finnish?
Emily: Not very well. I can understand a bit, but it is quite a difficult language and because English was my mother tongue they wanted to practice their English and preferred to speak English with me. But yeah I did take lessons and try to learn it... and that was all-
David: I understand. I’ve had a similar experience with learning French. My frequent business trips to France didn’t help me much in language learning — some basic skills only. I wish I could take time to start regular lessons.
Emily: Probably I needed more lessons in Finnish too. Anyway I decided to move back to Melbourne so I took the trans-Siberian train.
David: Incredible!
Emily: Once I got back to Melbourne I started my post-doctoral research which was in a different field from heart problems, actually in the field of our immune system.
David: Well, it is quite a different direction. What influenced you most?
Emily: I think it was my previous working experience in London and my colleagues at the lab who encouraged me greatly to start this. So that was three years and that was in Melbourne. Then I just published the work and decided to travel.
Пояснение.
A — 2. ...my university degree and after that I worked in a heart disease research institute. At that time I decided to start my career in medicine.
В — 1. ...so I went travelling and I travelled through Western Europe and ended up in London and I worked at the hospital in an immunology lab and that was more diagnostic work. It was quite interesting (под new experiences имеется в виду новый опыт работы, в Мельбурне Эмили больше года работала "in a heart disease research institute... on different patient recovery programs").
С — 2. The girl's saying that it was interesting to study immunology in London.
D — 2. And the seminars are given in English as well.
E — 1. I’ve had a similar experience with learning French. My frequent business trips to France didn’t help me much in language learning.
F — 3. Нет информации.
G — 3. Нет информации.
Ответ: 2122133.
Типичные ошибки
- Утверждение о поезде по транссибирской магистрали ты счёл подтверждённым, хотя о таких желаниях в записи не говорится. Проверь, кто именно и что сообщает.
- Планы героини снова поехать в Лондон отмечены как верные, но о Лондоне речь идёт только в прошлом. Следи за временем глаголов и за словами-маркерами будущего.
В тренажёре: подсказки по шагам, разбор твоей ошибки ИИ-репетитором (он не даёт готовый ответ), повторение ошибок по интервалам и общий прогресс. Все задания №2 по английскому языку